🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.